Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Author affiliation: University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (G.S. Caleiro, I.M. Claro, C.A. da Costa, E.C. Sabino, N.R. Faria); Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo (G.S. Caleiro, G.V. Basile, K.M.B. Nuevo, M.S. Cunha); University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA (I.M. Claro, X. Hua, W.M. de Souza); Pasteur Institute, São Paulo, São Paulo (R.M. Tubaki, R.M.T. de Menezes, S.A.S. Scandar, L.A.R. Colebrusco); Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil (E.L.L. Araújo); Imperial College London, London, UK (N.R. Faria)

St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV; species Orthoflavivirus louisense) is an endemic mosquitoborne orthoflavivirus in the Americas that can cause febrile and central nervous system diseases in humans, neurologic illnesses in equids, and fatal outcomes in both (1,2). SLEV is transmitted in enzootic and epizootic transmission cycles mainly by Culex and related genera of mosquitoes; humans and equids are incidental and dead-end hosts (1). In South America, sporadic SLEV human cases have been reported since 1953, and numerous serosurveys indicated SLEV circulation (1,35). However, reports of active SLEV circulation remain scarce in South America. Here, we conducted a molecular epidemiology study in mosquitoes collected during 2016–2018 in São Paulo state, Brazil.

During November 2016–June 2019, we captured Culicinae mosquitoes across 9 genera and combined the samples into 3,375 pools for analysis. The most abundant species were Aedes scapularis (26.5%, 893/3,375) and Ae. albopictus (21.7%, 731/3,375) (Appendix). Next, we extracted RNA from all homogenized mosquito pools and performed real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) to detect flavivirus RNA (6). We detected flavivirus RNA in 0.16% (3/3,375) of the mosquito pools. Positive mosquito pools were Ae. albopictus (strain no. MO239, n = 3 specimens), Ae. aegypti (strain no. MO1424, n = 1 specimen), and Sabethes chloropterus (strain no. MO730, n = 1 specimen), which were collected during November 24, 2016–February 16, 2017, in São José do Rio Preto and Araçatuba municipalities (Appendix). Subsequently, we conducted viral isolation in Ae. albopictus clone C6/36 cells from positive samples. We isolated all 3 positive strains in C6/36 cells and confirmed by immunofluorescent staining and real-time RT-PCR. Then, we used nanopore sequencing (7) to obtain nearly complete coding sequences (>99%) for 6 SLEV strains, at an average coverage >20-fold/nucleotide. We submitted all sequences to GenBank (accession nos. PP855630–4 and PP871388).

Figure

Figure. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree in a study of molecular epidemiology of St. Louis encephalitis virus in São Paulo State, Brazil, 2016–2018. Tree shows 219 representative SLEV complete coding sequence genomes, including…

To contextualize SLEV circulation in São Paulo state, we sequenced 3 SLEV isolates identified in São Paulo state during 1993–2004 that had been either partially sequenced or never sequenced (Appendix). Next, we conducted a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis that showed that the SLEV strains MO239, MO1424, and MO730 from this study, and historical strain SPH253157 clustered in a well-supported clade (100% bootstrap) at the basal of genotype III (Figure). In addition, historical SLEV strains SPAR149623 and SPAR147631 clustered within genotype V, along with strains identified in Brazil and Peru during 1973–2006 and in the United States in 2003 (Figure). The SLEV strains we sequenced shared 98.6%–98.9% nucleotide identity with other genotype III strains and 99.8%–99.9% nucleotide identity among themselves. The newly sequenced genotype V strains showed a 93.3% nucleotide divergence from the genotype III strains. We identified 75 aa substitutions across the sequenced SLEV strains; most substitutions were in the envelope and nonstructural 4B proteins (16.0%, 12/75 in each) and the nonstructural 5 protein (38.7%, 29/75) (Appendix).

This study reports the active circulation of SLEV during 2016–2018 in São Paulo state, Brazil. We found that SLEV genotype III continues to circulate in Brazil in Aedes and Sabethes spp. mosquitoes since the human case that was reported in 2004 (8). SLEV genotype III has caused sporadic outbreaks in Argentina since 1979 (6). In 2014, SLEV genotype III was identified in the western United States, presumably introduced from South America by migratory birds (9). We detected SLEV in Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti, and Sa. chloropterus mosquitoes, but the role of those mosquito species in SLEV transmission requires further field and experimental entomological studies. Also, the Sa. chloropterus mosquito is a vector of yellow fever virus in Brazil, but its role in SLEV transmission remains to be determined.

The first limitation of our study is that we focused on the molecular detection of SLEV in mosquitoes, which provides insight into active infections, but further investigations are required to assess SLEV circulation in vertebrates, including humans, through molecular and serologic methods. Serologic methods in areas with cocirculating flaviviruses present challenges because of potential cross-reactivity (10); however, this approach can substantially contribute to our understanding of the extent of both current and past SLEV infections in the region. Second, our mosquito sampling was predominately Aedes spp., but because Culex spp. mosquitoes are the primary vector for SLEV, more research is needed to determine the dynamic transmission of SLEV in Brazil. Finally, the lack of blood meal analysis in our study prevents the identification of potential amplifying hosts for SLEV in the region and the determining vector feeding preferences.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates active SLEV circulation in mosquitoes in São Paulo state, Brazil. These findings emphasize the need for continued surveillance efforts using a One Health concept to understand the transmission dynamics and ecologic drivers of SLEV.

Dr. Caleiro is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Biological Sciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil. Her research interests include epidemiological surveillance of emerging viruses with a focus on arboviruses and respiratory viruses.

Top

We thank the Superintendence for Control of Endemic Diseases, State of São Paulo (Sucen), team for mosquito capture and Viviana Menezes for mosquito RNA extraction. We also thank Vector-borne Diseases laboratory staff for field surveillance studies and virus isolation.

We dedicate this article in memory of Akemi Suzuki.

This study was supported by CNPq (grant no. 305628/2020-8) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) and São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (grant nos. MR/S0195/1, 2018/14389-0, and 2022/05637-6).

G.S.C. was sponsored by Fesima project (grant no. GAPS/NATO 479/2020). I.M.C. was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (grant nos. 2018/17176-8 and 2023/11521-3), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-034540). G.V.B. was sponsored by São Paulo Research Foundation (grant no. 2021/09103-3). W.M.d.S was supported by a Global Virus Network fellowship, Burroughs Wellcome Fund (grant no. 1022448), and Wellcome Trust–Digital Technology Development award (Climate Sensitive Infectious Disease Modelling; grant no. 226075/Z/22/Z).

Source